Step 2: Even though we did not have a class meeting last week, I still learned a lot while doing work at home. I learned about how to revise better through reading the Dethier article about how to revise my papers better and with a correct attitude. We should not feel ashamed if our first few drafts are really bad, because this is the point of revising: to make our articles better. And to make sure that we do not make any structural mistakes, we should write down the main idea we are trying to express in each paragraph. By doing so, it can help us have a better outline about our essays when we revise. Also, I learn about how to peer revise more efficiently, I found that I cannot understand what my peers are trying to say when I am reading them by myself at a quiet place, and I cannot quietly do my work without getting distracted. I found these strategies and habits useful and critical for writings, as well as understand how I work as a writer and reader. Step 3: After reading the peer reviews for my Wikipedia paper, I realized that there are still a lot of places I need to correct and improve on for my Wikipedia paper. I need to work on citing my sources in the text, as well as checking if I am citing my sources in a correct way. To do that, I would need to go online and review the correct way of citing a source in the purdue OWL website, so that I can make sure that my sources are cited in a right way. My peers also mentioned that I need subheadings in my Wikipedia entry, because I have too many ideas in one paragraph, which can sometimes be confusing for my readers to understand my point, so I would need to separate some of my paragraphs, and label them with new and more detailed heading. I hope that my paper can be improved by making these changes. Step 4:
Revision plan:
1 Comment
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |